Literature Review on Break Up Strategies

ratiocination any benevolent of descent is found to amaze a traumatic experience to both parties manifold. This could take on a romantic human relationship, friendship and as yet business partnerships. All relationships involve surd intersomebodyal communication skills that would allow the parties involved to cope and eventually heal emotionally. in that location are five phases in blastout up from a relationship. Duck (as qtd in Dickson, Saunders, and Stringer, 1994 & inter personal Communication, para 18-22) place the break up model to have the crack-up phase, intrapsychic phase, dyadic phase, social phase, and grave dress phase.However, any break-up solution would not head for the hills successfully unless the three factors in the relationship are identified, namely the high take of satisfaction with the relationship, the acknowledgment of both parties of the term and effort that has gone into building it, and the absence of new compensatory attachments. (Dicks on et al, 2004) According to Dr. Margaret Paul, people establish their best to end relationships gracefully such(prenominal) that the society perceives it as a grammatical construction of their worth when someone does not exigency to be with them any longer (Ending Relationships, para 1).But ending relationships gracefully testament always have to go by dint of hurting the early(a) persons feelings. A person whitethorn experience wonderful people though they whitethorn not feel any corporation to them or a single individualistic alone. And the only way that person squirt end that relationship is telling the other the truth. There are on the other hand various strategies in faulting up from a relationship as identified by Baxter (1982, 1984 qtd in interpersonal Communication, para 12-17) as either slanted or bilateral and indirect or direct.Some of these strategies identified were avoidance, Pseudo de-escalation, cost escalation, fade-way, the blessed game, and others. Much early work examining initiation, intensification, and issue as relative goals simply compiled ad-hoc lists of strategies for redefining relationships without organizing strategies some a theoretical framework. More novel work has suggested that theories of politeness or facework may be applied to foster catch of how people regard and respond to the relational goals of initiation, intensification, and termination of relationships. (Kunkel, Olufowote, Robson, & Wilson, 2003)Politeness possible action is one of the close commonly utilized strategies implemented by individuals in order to enact their want miens from their partners. According to the theory, convincing another person to alter his or her own behavior is inherently face threatening, thus they wont politeness strategies to reach to balance the competing goals f persuading the other an supporting the other persons face. But politeness theory falls short in its office to explain how compliance seekers must do with multiple potential face threats to both their own and the target persons face.(Krunkel et al, 2003) In an condition written by Janet Jacobson on countrysingles. com, their study showed that leavers an lefts have varies header strategies after breaking up from a relationship. Leavers focuses to a greater extent on self-enhancement strategies through arrest and improving themselves by dismissing to a greater extent than of time with friends and families and dates other people. There were nevertheless those who become introspective and spends time alone, reflecting on the relationship they had left. (Jacobson, 2004)On one hand, individuals who were left rotter focus on self-enhancement. The same with the leavers, lefts spend time with friends and family but they keep themselves more busy with work and/hobbies. They are more likely to change their perspectives on the relationship as much as they try to change their physical appearance to wager good. There were also those who bad-mouths former partners and those who become intentionally mean by vamp with their past partners and eventually dumping them off.Avoidance was as well another strategy identified by the respondents of the study upon coping up with breakups. (Jacobson, 2004) References & Works Cited Dickson, D. , Saunders, C. , & Stringer, M. 1994. Rewarding People The scientific discipline of Responding Positively. International Journal of Social Psychiatry. Interpersonal communication relationship dissolution. Retrieved from http//en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Interpersonal_communication_relationship_dissolutionPhases_of_dissolution on celestial latitude 7, 2007. Jacobson, J. 2004.COPING with a BREAK-UP a report on strategies. Retrieved from http//www. countrysingles. com/azsinglescenecom/archives/coping_with_6-04. htm on December 7, 2007. Kunkel, A. , Olufowote, J. , Robson, S. , & Wilson, S. 2003. identicalness implications of influence goals initiating, intensifying, and ending romantic rela tionships. Hesperian Journal of Communication Paul, M. Ending Relationships Gracefully. Retrieved from http//www. innerbonding. com/show- article/657/ending-relationships-gracefully. html on December 7, 2007.